The Official Weblog of Sheldon Bull
Television Sitcom Writer, Producer, and Director.

Enlightened by Good Writing

Print the article

This entry was posted on 11/5/2011 12:42 PM and is filed under uncategorized.

Good writing always cheers me up.  2011 may turn out to be an exceptional year for scripted half-hour TV comedy series.  Two and a Half Men seems to have successfully replaced Charlie Sheen with Ashton Kutcher.  Two Broke Girls is the most successful new series on TV.  The Big Bang Theory continues to hold Thursday night for CBS.  Whoever thought CBS would wrest Thursday away from NBC?  New Girl is drawing viewers on Fox.  30 Rock will be back later in the season along with the premier of Chelsea Handler’s new situation comedy.  Modern Family, The Office, Parks and Recreation, Community, The Middle, How I Met Your Mother, Raising Hope, and Rules of Engagement are all alive and well.

There’s a lot to like right now on the half-hour comedy front.

There’s also one new half-hour comedy series that simply takes my breath away; that is as smart and different and funny and deep and surprising and thought-provoking and just plain brilliant as anything I have ever seen on television.  It is as good as anything you will see at the movies, too.  That astounding new series is Enlightened on HBO.

One of the most impressive things about The Office when it first came on the air was how the comedy cut so close to the bone.  The characters weren’t just real, they were uncomfortably real.  The series was as unsettling as it was funny.  Enlightened starts at the highest point ever achieved by The Office and then leaps ten stories higher.

Enlightened achieves a level of sophistication and emotional honesty seldom seen on television – and even more rarely seen in the movies.  The scripts accomplish a dramatic complexity to which few of us can even hope to aspire.

The acting lives up to the writing.  Laura Dern is sure to win an Emmy for her performance as Amy Jellicoe, a tortured, neurotic, self-absorbed former executive for a Riverside, California corporation that seems as vapid as the building it occupies and the city it calls home.  The rest of the cast, including Dern’s real-life mother, Diane Ladd, and Luke Wilson, is as good as Dern.  Wilson has not been this well-used since The Royal Tannenbaums.

The look of the series is also impressive, as good as a feature film.  Scenes are washed in specific colors - often very soft pastels - that add to the mood of the moment.

I send an astonished level of respect to co-creators Laura Dern and Mike White (Chuck and Buck, The Good Girl, School of Rock).  White also appears in the series as Amy Jellicoe’s co-worker, Tyler.

Usually only playwrights and novelists are allowed to reach down so deeply inside of themselves.  Those of us who are lucky enough to write for the screen are seldom offered this degree of creative freedom.  Most of us aren't up to it, anyway.  HBO has handed such an opportunity to Mike White and Laura Dern, and they have made the most of it.  I’m in awe of Mike White.  This is near genius.

Thank you, Mike White, Laura Dern, and HBO for Enlightened.  I pray the audience appreciates what you have given them, and I sorely hope that this will be the beginning of a long run.

One last note:  I saw Clint Eastwood’s new film, J. Edgar, on Tuesday night at the DGA.  It is also pretty remarkable.  I’m sure an Oscar nomination will be forthcoming for Leonardo DeCaprio.  The movie is a little slow, but it is also more complex than you’d expect.  Clint Eastwood is a Republican, so I didn’t expect an Oliver Stone-type hatchet job on Hoover – even if Hoover deserved it.  Written by Dustin Lance Black, who also wrote the screenplay for Milk, J. Edgar is a tragedy, a tortured love story, and it humanizes a man who has been almost entirely misrepresented, either as a hero he never was or as a monster.  Turns out he was a complex and deeply flawed human being, very much like Amy Jellicoe on Enlightened, and not that different from the rest of us.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

    • 11/5/2011 3:11 PM Michelle wrote:
      Fantastic post and spot on about Enlightened!
      Reply to this
    • 12/24/2011 4:58 AM Mark wrote:
      First, I have to disagree about Two and Half Men. The show is flat, and not funny. The EP’s ego got the best of him.

      Second, Eastwood is barely a Republican, and it’s sad that so many in Hollywood refuse to be honest about history.

      Third, a free host for your blog? OMG.
      Reply to this
      1. 12/24/2011 11:33 AM Sheldon Bull wrote:
        If you don't like Two and a Half Men, no one is forcing you to watch it.  I don't watch it, either.  I grew tired of it years ago.  I have acknowledged, however, honestly on this blog, that the series is a huge hit.  Two and a Half Men is doing very well in the ratings this season with the addition of Ashton Kutcher.  I don't know Chuck Lorre.  I have never met him or worked with him.  He may have a big ego.  Most TV producers do.  Most successful people in any business have big egos.  Chuck Lorre is the most successful producer of half-hour comedy on television today, with three concurrent hit shows.  I don't think anyone has had this much success at one time in half-hour comedy since Norman Lear or Garry Marshall back in the seventies.  Like Chuck Lorre or dislike him, he is a big success.  A person who aspires to success in half-hour comedy, and whose mind is not clouded with resentment or jealousy, can learn from Chuck Lorre's example

        I've tried to avoid politics on the blog.  The blog is about writing.  I don't know what constitutes a Republican these days other than somebody who is registered to vote in that party.  Clint Eastwood has acknowledged, proudly, over and over again in the press, that he is a member of the Republican Party and that he votes for Republican candidates.  I take him at his word. 

        I'm not sure what the statement, "it's so sad that so many in Hollywood refuse to be honest about history" means.  It's poorly worded and vague.  Perhaps you might want to sign up for some writing lessons to learn how to express yourself better with language. 

        It has been my experience that when people complain about others not being "honest" about history, what they really mean is that they want others to adhere to their views.  I'm not here to defend Hollywood's interpretation of history.   Hollywood is a section of the city of  Los Angeles, California, occupied by a very diverse group of people with a wide range of political views and historical interpretations.  When the word "Hollywood" is used as a reference to the motion picture and television industry, then the people who work in that industry are too often painted by outsiders with a wide and inaccurate brush.  People on the political right love to brand "Hollywood" as a bastion of bleeding heart liberals - the worst thing a person can be in this world, from the narrow and often dishonest perspective of the political right.  Forget that Jesus Christ was a bleeding heart liberal, literally. 

        Almost all of the executives that I ever knew or worked for at the networks and studios - the big business honchos who oversaw the giant multinational corporations that control the vast majority of the media in this country - were Republicans.  Rupert Murdoch, who oversees the News Corporation empire, and who owns the Fox TV networks and the Twentieth-Century Fox movie studio, is a Republican.  Sumner Redstone, who oversees the Viacom conglomerate that includes the CBS TV and radio networks, MTV, Paramount Studios, and other cable outlets, is a Republican.  The top executives at Disney were all Republicans, as were the top executives at Universal.  When one thinks of other huge media conglomerates such as Sony, one only assumes that these people are more sympathetic to the pro-big-business leanings of the political right.

        When one listens to professional con artists like Sarah Palin, Newt Gingrich, Rush Limbaugh, and others condemn Hollywood and the news and entertainment media in general as being left-leaning, one can only laugh at the fools and dupes who believe them.  Clearly, none of their empty-headed followers has ever actually picked up a newspaper or opened a magazine and bothered to notice that all of the major media outlets are owned by giant corporations who will stop at nothing to maximize their profits.

        Reply to this
    • 12/24/2011 5:54 PM Mark wrote:
      Thanks for the quick response.

      1. It was not my intent to insult you or your beliefs. I leave that to the “lefties;” they are better at it, than am I. (yes, that’s an ironic dig)

      2.Before you read the rest of this response; could you answer a question? … I’ll wait. … O.K.? Awesome! (yes sentence fragment, vague.).

      Do you have to be a comedian to write Sitcoms? How do you know if you have enough “funny” to write?

      3. Come on Mr Bull; attacks upon my grammar, sentence structure, (mis)use of quotes, or my possible listening choices is: lame, and disappointing. I can get that in from PBS, NYT, LAT, or at any coffee shop in LA county.

      Onward!

      2 1/2: I was referring to Ashton Kutcher coming on the show. I had a better idea for how they could have brought him onto the show, and with continuity. Yes, I know; you hear that all the time. My point was, Mr Lorre put his ego ahead of the good of the show. That’s poor business judgement. It’s refreshing that a “star” was fired from a show. The reboot was poorly handled.

      EASTWOOD: My point was that Eastwood, is a RINO. To assume that Eastwood won’t do a “liberal” pleasing movie is a bit of a stretch. His movies have clearly moved away from the mainstream, and to more artistic fare. (insinuations galore, blast away)

      “Hollywood” is a reference to the U.S. Broadcast, and Film Entertainment Industry based mostly in Los Angeles. If I said Broadway w/o quotes; no doubt you would attack me (again) as being geographically challenged.

      I gave my original closing the “nine iron.” It deserved it. Here’s the re-write.

      Your reaction to my comments is typical of how the majority of “Hollywood” responds to people like me. The “fly over country” people who you are trying to convince into watching your shows that usually demean our beliefs, while subtly insulting us.

      You make assumptions about our beliefs, ideology, listening habits, and with whom we place trust. You then demean, insult, and attack everything/one you assume we believe in, and us personally. “Hollywood” is believed to be radically liberal, and rightly (ha ha) so. No need for premium channels, or to even visit. All you need to do is look at the shows on “mainstream” T.V., local theater, or listen to the people who work in “Hollywood” to see it’s ideology on display. How many Obama fundraisers in 2011? It’s obvious to all, who wish to see it.

      Someday I will write, and make series that is pro-family, pro-christian, pro-American, pro-Military, showing morals and values positively. You have inspired me to write a show that you no doubt will hate. It will play well OUTSIDE of “Hollywood” with MY people.

      How would you feel about a vanity card, thanking you, on the pilot episode?

      I hope you will do me the courtesy of, at least, reading the pilot script BEFORE you “bone me” with your “Hollywood” buddies.

      BTW, Merry Christmas. No it’s not a joke
      Reply to this
      1. 12/25/2011 10:51 AM Sheldon Bull wrote:
        As I have grown older, I'm afraid I have lost all patience with the political right wing.  You are a sorry band of selfish, small-minded, ignorant, racist people who care nothing for others and believe you are entitled to privileges that you do not deserve.  I grew up in a family of right wingers.  I left their self absorption, jealousy, resentment, paranoia, and crudity behind a long time ago.  I was talented and I became a huge success while they stewed in their self pity.  I tried to be patient for years with this so-called "other point of view" but in the wake of so many crimes against humanity, I have lost that patience forever.

        I'd love to be more diplomatic with you people, but I find you all disgusting.  Is that direct enough for you?

        Reply to this
    Leave a comment

    Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

     Enter the above security code (required)

     Name

     Email (will not be published)

     Website

    Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.